Quote from: xadsa418 on February 05, 2016, 09:50:22 AM

CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=bbf48bacdea061095019; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage Good shrmcoin
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar blackcoin, diff=3, codehash=5c77fb68fcd0580d7737; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good

What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.

Last time I saw this it was to get on BITTREX, is that the deal here?