Sorry but the record already speaks for itself. All of his long-range themes have come true. 100%. Crisis in Ukraine (well before there was any crisis), oil, gold, US stocks, 2007 real estate collapse, etc.. Maybe not exactly to the day and maybe one of 2 or 3 scenarios was elected, but it has never been the case that he has stated A will happen and instead the opposite happened. sloanf habitually takes MA's CONDITIONAL scenarios statements out-of-context and then claims this is failure of prediction. It doesn't matter how many times this is explained to sloanf, he will continue to commit that same mental handicap.
Additionally, he is the very few analysts out there with integrity. He is one of the very few who tell you honestly when the market is to volatile and he is unable to give you a helpful pointer. Anybody who trades every day on the market like myself and pay attentions to all kind of opinions probably can agree that almost all analysts, experts, fund managers, CNBC shills and anybody who appears in the media would tell you all kind of investment tips. On the other hand Armstrong tells you, "it is too volatile, I can't give you any certain answer" (apart from his paid services he even writes this in his blogs) which indicates quite an integrity and moral.