Quote from: danielW on February 06, 2016, 03:05:05 AM

Quote from: DieJohnny on February 06, 2016, 02:51:07 AM

The facts:

1. Bitcoin would NOT have failed if Satoshi had chosen a 2MB limit rather than 1MB, to say otherwise exposes you for the complete idiot you would be. Therefore, any FUD about 2MB is laid bare as completely propaganda.
2. Adding 2MB now means nothing as far as the technology, network and platform is concerned.., refusing to do so is simply because you do not want to establish a precedent that you can increase the block size to address scalability issues. Why? because the necessity of a sidechain solution for scaling moves further down the road.

There is nothing else to talk about.

Facts:

1. Bitcoin functions perfectly with current limit. There is no urgent issue that is not FUD. It is a wholly manufactured non-existant FUD crisis. To say network is clogging, is FUD propaganda. I can send bitcoins all the time with no problems.

2. The crash landing FUD propaganda predicted by Mike Hearn has not happened, despite FUD being spread months back that by December (or latest Jan) the network would break down.

3. There is No reason to increase the block size limit now. To say otherwise exposes you for the complete ... Therefore, any FUD about need to increase to 2MB is laid bare as completely propaganda

1. Bitcoin would have been just fine wtih a 2MB limit rather than 1MB. I think you missed that part.
2. Scalability is a red herring, a distraction, it is something for you to argue about but has nothing to do with the decision not to raise the limit, but you didn't read my last sentence......