Quote from: Minotaur26 on February 06, 2016, 02:50:24 PM

A huge amount of development work has been done in Dash.

I really don't know why people insist in trying to compare this two projects, but for whatever reason they do. It is pointless

You built an overpriced (way over budget) soda machine and hired a stripper to stand in front of it. That's sleazy marketing, not "development work."

Comparing two products competing to supply the same demand for private e-cash is not "pointless."

Evaluation of competitive advantage is how markets work; it's why they exist. But I'm not surprised to find economic illiteracy in Minitaur26, who is Duffield's #1 minion.

You obviously wish to create some kind of truce, such as the one Darkcoin and XC had, where we ignore your scam and stop saying fraud when we see fraud. That truce served to perpetuate (aid and abet) the XC scam, which caused dozens or hundreds of people to lose BTC when it died.

Why does it still take hours or days to mix Dash? Where is the masternode blinding that was supposed to have been in the latest version, released last summer?

Even your most brainwashed cult members are starting to wonder WTF is in the Kool-Aid at the Evan's Gate compound.

Quote from: rentahash on January 29, 2016, 07:58:21 AM

I want to point few major issues why we are still not in production:

1. there is not a way to sendmanyIX
2. there is not a way to mix coins trough dash-cli
3. there should be a better way to get notification if transaction came trough IX or normal.

Moving the goalposts to the hopelessly ambitious Evolution roadmap of blue-sky unicorn projects does noting to finish the previous tasks.

Evolution is an exercise in creative writing and marketecture, not "development work."

Quote from: toknormal on January 29, 2016, 08:44:57 AM

There are entire, fully funded projects solely working on distributed storage. Then there are entire, fully funded projects working on social networking type applications. Then there are entire, fully funded projects working on API building.

Given that background, any self respecting investor is going to conclude that Dash has bitten off more than it can chew trying to do all this to a high technical standard with only 1 or 2 core developers. They will wonder where the efficiency gain is in development (i.e. what is it that those projects are doing that Dash doesn't need to do).

Comparing zero-sum, conflict-inducing "DASH budget proposals" (which are paid for by fiat Dash made up from nothing) to Monero's open-ended, pay-what-you-want Forum Funding System is an entirely valid exercise.

The only reason you seek to discourage such comparisons is because Dash looks terrible when measured by the Monero benchmark.

Monero has exposed Dash's snake oil and bad crypto, now it's time for Decred, a professional/fair/honest PoS coin, to finish off your instamined HYIP scam for good.