Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 07, 2016, 10:29:03 AM

Quote from: orpington on February 07, 2016, 10:26:35 AM

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 07, 2016, 10:21:19 AM

Quote from: orpington on February 07, 2016, 10:15:51 AM

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 07, 2016, 10:10:46 AM

Quote from: orpington on February 07, 2016, 03:39:52 AM

Quote from: blunderer on February 07, 2016, 01:48:02 AM

Quote from: gijoes on February 07, 2016, 01:41:31 AM

Quote from: inca on February 07, 2016, 01:13:56 AM

I am genuinely looking forward to seeing what response you, brg444, icebreaker, hdbuck et al. provide for our entertainment if the network actually forks to classic and no disaster occurs. All that brazen supercilious venom spewed over the last year with potentially nothing to show for haha.

I'm glad you're finding it hilarious. I don't. Because I invested non-trivial portion of my portfolio into Bitcoin and I'd hate it all to go "poof!" if a hostile hard fork backfires and the net DOES split into two. Are you willing to bet ALL your BTC that this has a zero chance of happening? I would not be so sure.

Still got time to cut your loose Cheesy

*Not much tho, look at them Classic nodes springing up! Like mushrooms after an autumn rain

Actually, those classic nodes are more like fungus spreading on the corpses of XT/unlimited nodes. Grin

So we agree that Bitcoin Classic is a kind of fungus. I guess that's progress.

Yes. All fungi have a certain role to play in any given ecosystem.

Careful, you're turning Gavinista now.

No. But we certainly do need mechanisms for the removal of decay whatever that might be. Classic is a temporary manifestation of this and it does serve a certain perhaps obscure purpose for sure.

Agree 100%

All the fighting and arguing of late is rather disheartening. I miss those days of solidarity and common purpose and wonder if it will ever return.

Whatever, though. It's all just a fucking game anyway! Grin