Quote from: anisoptera on May 24, 2011, 01:16:39 AM

Quote from: de4l on May 24, 2011, 12:47:34 AM

Quote from: Tyran on May 24, 2011, 12:33:57 AM

Quote from: de4l on May 23, 2011, 09:53:05 PM

Quote from: vitsum on May 23, 2011, 07:27:49 PM

coefficients are made in such way that sum of losses is always greater than sum of wins. That's why site doesn't lose money.

The rest of the explanations were moot, this was the point. Suspicions confirmed.

Oh damn, and here I was thinking this was a charity site! Thanks for making me aware of that!
You're not very smart, are you? Cheesy

You can easily calculate the expected returns yourself using 80% chance to succeed for any move. Of course it is always negative. It's a gambling site!

Nothing of that has anything to do with your claim, which is clearly wrong:

Quote

the free version is always easier than when you put money down

Sounds like you are just angry you lost some money on this ^_^

I'm sorry for giving all you trolls bait, 1/2 a bitcoin isn't enough to make even a child angry (note how I never said anything about money?), I was concerned that statistically the free version was displaying a repeatable pattern that showed up ~70% more than the paid to play ones.... if you're interested in providing actual information I'd love to hear it, but 2/3 of these replies lower my intelligence when I read them.

As far as "actual information" goes, perhaps you should give us some. The game data is right there after every game. You can play the free one forever. Go ahead and gather a decent sample size, maybe 500 games or so, showing a statistically significant trend.

It's only significant when compared to the paid to play one, which, obviously is in no one but the site owner's (another gambling profiteer like yourself) best interest. Like I've said previously I don't have any issues being wrong or corrected, and at this point I would much rather be wrong than spend 500 trials worth of bitcoins.