Quote from: Lauda on February 08, 2016, 08:20:32 PM

Quote from: johnyj on February 08, 2016, 08:17:27 PM

Surprisingly, you agree with an increase of block size, then why so critic about Classic. I think the purpose of Classic is just to bump the block size a little bit and practice hard fork, because with a hard fork, even segwit can be implemented more neatly

Surprisingly? I was(am) supportive of dynamic blocks, 2 MB blocks (once the validation problem is fixed), and other proposals. What I'm not supportive is: 1. Controversial hard forks; 2. 2 MB blocks with a bad workaround for the validation problem. Let's not forget that Classic essentially has no team excluding Garzik and Gavin.

yet Lauda for months has been kissing blockstR3am's ass and saying that 2mb rule chance done by core as part of aprils rollout that includes segwit was a bad idea..

but now finally Lauda is seeing the light that a 2mb+segwit is possible, isnt bad and can actually help everyone in the community.
it only took him 2 months to finally concede his biased devotions.

so maybe now Lauda can stop the bullshit nonsense about R3 and classic hate and start being open minded to core doing a 2mb segwit.. that way things like confidential transactions and all the other tx bloat wont impact the blocks as much as there would be capacity to grow