Quote from: franky1 on February 09, 2016, 04:05:34 AM

lol

madjules007 and lauda use the word "ad hominem" alot.

i guess they circle jerk in the same social networks and talk to each other alot and think it somehow makes them look smarter by saying "ad hominem" as much as they can.

is it some word of the month competition you lot have. or do you truly think that spouting waffle that includes the word "ad hominem" makes whatever you say sound like religious scripture that should be trusted, believed and followed.

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 09, 2016, 04:08:05 AM

How very ad hominem of you. Wink

Goodnight everybody!!

LOL, indeed.

Franky, personal attacks aren't legit. They don't prove anything. They are a dishonest form of argument. If you don't like the words "ad hominem", then just remember that.

sAt0sHiFanClub argued that my opinions are wrong because "I am a bagholder." Not only can he not prove that "I am a bagholder" but he can't prove that this has any meaning whatsoever to the debate. It was purely an insult, intended to degrade from my character and therefore prove me wrong (even though it is 100% irrelevant to the subject). Is that a dishonest form of argument or not?