Quote from: madjules007 on February 09, 2016, 07:34:31 AM

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 09, 2016, 07:19:30 AM

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 09, 2016, 03:48:27 AM

Quote

Again, forking is fine. Just do it with consensus -- or otherwise implement your fork as a stated altcoin. There are two camps here: one camp that either doesn't understand or doesn't care whether bitcoin is broken into multiple ledgers forever based on differing rule sets, and another camp that wants to avoid that. The block size debate is not worth breaking consensus over.

This is exactly what I've been trying to tell Fatty. He's just very set in his ways. Embarrassed

When the time comes, and you're on the wrong side of the 75%, then you're the one who's standing in the way of consensus.

So, don't be bad. Bad is not good.

And when you're on the wrong side of the 75%... rabble rabble rabble!

Two can play at that game. Wink

In all seriousness, as I've said, a majority of hashpower is only good enough to trigger the fork. You can assume that everyone will immediately update to Classic nodes and therefore that only one chain will survive. But that's unlikely. I sure won't be updating. Let's see how it pans out.

Ok, but then you'll have to take some of the responsibility for the bumpy ride.

BtcDrak and Peter Todd have plenty of experience with alts. Maybe they can join Luke-Jr on his JeebusCoin and you can all GPU a bit.

That'll be cute.