Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 09, 2016, 08:27:30 PM

Quote from: aztecminer on February 09, 2016, 03:14:28 PM

Quote from: danielW on February 08, 2016, 12:17:25 PM

Quote from: Fatman3001 on February 08, 2016, 12:02:08 PM

Quote from: matrix zion on February 08, 2016, 11:56:41 AM

Quote from: danielW on February 08, 2016, 11:43:20 AM

Unfortunately classic is not quite dead yet.

When it is and the threat of chaotic, contentious and unnecessary (segwit is superior) hard fork is over, we can all look forward to a massive price increase (like move from 230->450 after xt collapse) and bitcoin moving forward.

These bombing runs from Gavin and coinbase are getting tiring.

I doubt they will be able to centralise bitcoin development under their control.

Why unfortunately? Isn't it always good to have different possibilities? you never know what might happen Wink

I personnally support all the coins! Classic, Core, Litecoin...

It's precisely because Bitcoin Classic isn't an alt they all go mental.

No its because I want bitcoin development lead by people who:

value decetralisation, provide features like confidential transactions etc.

as opposed to people who:

visit cia, join organisations that want to work with government to police bitcoin, float ideas like blacklists of transactions, and do not care about ordinary node users etc.

I don't want bitcoin to be crippled by these people into paypal 2.0 (except slower)

are u saying u want gavin and coinbase out ?? ... i am trying to interpret what u mean . u do not like the "blockchain blacklists" because of what reasons again ?? from what i gather from what u said, u don't like "blockchain blacklisters" or "cripplecoiners" .. that sounds like a real problem ... can u look outside your window ?? are the blacked out SUV's parked outside yet Huh

their might be a drone too watching you what you say about gavin and coinbase .

You are acting retarded, Mr. Aztec. You are trying to act as if you don't realize that you are asking stupid ass question, and really these are a kind of trolling disingenuous search for responses.

Accordingly:

>>>>>>are u saying u want gavin and coinbase out ??<<<<<

these are pushers for increasing the blocksize and threatening hardforks to achieve these goals

>>>>>.. i am trying to interpret what u mean . u do not like the "blockchain blacklists" because of what reasons again ?? from what i gather from what u said, u don't like "blockchain blacklisters" or "cripplecoiners" .. that sounds like a real problem .<<<<<

Not too many people really like the idea of blacklists because that would inevitably take away from fungibility, and ultimately remove most value from bitcoin.

>>>can u look outside your window ?? are the blacked out SUV's parked outside yet Huh

their might be a drone too watching you what you say about gavin and coinbase .<<<<<

People do not need to be paranoid or conspiratorial in order to arrive at the conclusions that there may be nefarious forces that are pushing these various kinds of measures to make bitcoin more trackable and to keep bitcoin under wraps in significant ways and even to imply certain threats of monitoring to individuals who are using bitcoin (maybe to attempt to deter them from currently illegal acts?)

Thanks for highlighting dumbasses' positions JJG. Let it go before I have to go nuclear on the Aztec-butt smeller. Gosh, it stinks to high heaven.