Re: Altcoin blockchain experts - can anyone explain this semi-missing transaction?
looks like we have two competing threads with the same posts.. woot
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1352963.msg13833797#msg13833797
here's my reply to the above from the other thread ..
When you show up to someone's ANN and say they shouldn't be doing certain things,
be ready for them to point out that you're doing the exact same things.
You're the one who accused yourself.
lol. great defense.
he made me do it!! he was on MY thread!!
i'm innocent!!
and there you go again impugning again my good person. shame on you.
my posts were neither troll nor showed evidence that i could not read. such a false dichotomy.
ACP was trading at 60 sats,
you swapped at 600 sats,
ACP was trading at 600 sats.
We swapped at 600 sats.
there's a great quote somewhere saying how ACP was trading at 60 sats.
until you pumped it.
then swapped it.
But you are selling things in a marketplace for Bumba, so why did you bring it up since you say it's no different from what you're doing yourself?
yes, i told you earlier that we were creating artificial demand by doing that.
that is not the problem with what you are doing.
We're using the exact same system you're using:
we never claimed to have a trustless system, as you have.
yes, if you dump, people can see where the coins come from.
you do not have a trustless system
Kind of like how the top addresses hold 63% of Bumbacoins and you haven't said which addresses you control?
top 25 addresses, vs your 3 addresses ??
i have no idea what the rest of your richlists looks like
looks like i own #6 and #8 ,about 13% lol bodgey maths/ 6.5%
plus i have maybe 5% on exchange <--not sure about that figure.
Let's see how a pro answers:
you don't have trustless accountability.
you have an open ledger, so does bumbacoin, we just don't have arbitrary data.
we never bothered cos we lack any delusions of grandeur,
although it would be nice, but can't honestly see the need.
at the moment we have multiple addresses because thats' how it's happened,
change addresses have been a big reason for it,
the swap happened over a year ago, would be surprising if we'd never moved any coins.
lets put all the coins in address A.
let's send some coins for purpose X.
now the remaining funds, ie the change from this transaction, has gone to address B. etc,
so, let's put all the funds in addresses A B C, then we can leave most of the coins in their declared addresses when we move coins.
yes we could use coin control, but i use daemons by preference which lack coin control features.
yes, i could craft transactions incoroporating specified change address as origin address, but, i havent. much easier just sending them...
and as you love to point out. all the tx are there on the blockchain for anyone to look at
so, in conclusion, we do have the same level of trustless accountability if anyone wants to dig through the chain. lol
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1352963.msg13833797#msg13833797
here's my reply to the above from the other thread ..
(the only trust issues anyone has accused me of has been those you created with no basis 
)
)When you show up to someone's ANN and say they shouldn't be doing certain things,
be ready for them to point out that you're doing the exact same things.
You're the one who accused yourself.
lol. great defense.
he made me do it!! he was on MY thread!!
i'm innocent!!
Did I show up in your ANN to do that, or was it only in direct response to your posts in which you showed that you're either a troll or you can't read?
and there you go again impugning again my good person. shame on you.
my posts were neither troll nor showed evidence that i could not read. such a false dichotomy.
ACP was trading at 60 sats,
you swapped at 600 sats,
ACP was trading at 600 sats.
We swapped at 600 sats.
there's a great quote somewhere saying how ACP was trading at 60 sats.
until you pumped it.
then swapped it.
runpaint thought he could easily clear up the matter, defend BARR and shut up the fudder, by asking you to confirm that BARR was the reason for ACP going from 60 sats to 600.
you're working with an artificially inflated system by arbitrarily injecting funds into the process. this is no different to selling things in a market place for bumba.
But you are selling things in a marketplace for Bumba, so why did you bring it up since you say it's no different from what you're doing yourself?
yes, i told you earlier that we were creating artificial demand by doing that.
that is not the problem with what you are doing.
you havent even bothered working with a truly trustable system. you could dump any amount of Barr you wanted at any time.
We're using the exact same system you're using:
we never claimed to have a trustless system, as you have.
Our transparent accountability is trustless, because anyone can see exactly where every single BARR goes on the NXT blockchain in real-time.
yes, if you dump, people can see where the coins come from.
you do not have a trustless system
maybe you can comment on how it seems you quite obviously own at least ~61% of distributed BARR through three different accounts
Kind of like how the top addresses hold 63% of Bumbacoins and you haven't said which addresses you control?
top 25 addresses, vs your 3 addresses ??
i have no idea what the rest of your richlists looks like
looks like i own #6 and #8 ,
plus i have maybe 5% on exchange <--not sure about that figure.
1. which NXT accounts holding Barr/Offs do you or other team members own?
Let's see how a pro answers:
Most of them. What is the point of that question?
Why do you have multiple premine addresses and multiple "dev fund" addresses for Bumbacoin? Why can't you have trustless transparent accountability like BARR does?
you don't have trustless accountability.
you have an open ledger, so does bumbacoin, we just don't have arbitrary data.
we never bothered cos we lack any delusions of grandeur,
although it would be nice, but can't honestly see the need.
at the moment we have multiple addresses because thats' how it's happened,
change addresses have been a big reason for it,
the swap happened over a year ago, would be surprising if we'd never moved any coins.
lets put all the coins in address A.
let's send some coins for purpose X.
now the remaining funds, ie the change from this transaction, has gone to address B. etc,
so, let's put all the funds in addresses A B C, then we can leave most of the coins in their declared addresses when we move coins.
yes we could use coin control, but i use daemons by preference which lack coin control features.
yes, i could craft transactions incoroporating specified change address as origin address, but, i havent. much easier just sending them...
and as you love to point out. all the tx are there on the blockchain for anyone to look at
so, in conclusion, we do have the same level of trustless accountability if anyone wants to dig through the chain. lol