Quote from: ImI on February 11, 2016, 03:28:45 AM

Quote from: cbeast on February 11, 2016, 03:18:37 AM

Quote from: ImI on February 11, 2016, 03:16:09 AM

Quote from: cbeast on February 11, 2016, 03:06:58 AM

Quote from: ImI on February 11, 2016, 01:19:49 AM

Quote from: cbeast on February 11, 2016, 01:14:49 AM

No other coin has been through the fire yet. I doubt any of them will survive "governance".

to implement a voting-mechanism per stake could solve the issue. in the end its the holders of the currency who should decide which way to go.

That's what we have now. It's called fiat.

lol

i can't remember being asked what rate hike should be next...

That's because you don't have enough stake. Get yourself a Federal Reserve bank and enjoy the power.

so, in fiat we dont have a "voting-mechanism per stake"? you dont say?!

you see, in fact fiat is more like a small developer-group deciding which way to go. its basically the same, just some small group of politicians and economists deciding.

Bringing "stake" into Bitcoin rather than hashrate closes the door to participation. I'm not worried about the current politicking because there are people with more money than sense and people smart enough to spend it for them. Ultimately, necessity will drive a proper course of governance.