Quote from: myrkul on December 07, 2012, 05:33:24 PM

Quote from: cunicula on December 07, 2012, 05:29:44 PM

Quote from: cunicula on December 07, 2012, 04:44:16 PM

Intelligent people maintain multiple sets of contradictory beliefs simultaneously.

Quote from: myrkul on December 07, 2012, 05:12:16 PM

No, insane people do that. Orwell even coined a term for it: Doublethink.

This is the same Orwell who wrote the quote in my signature line you know. He was an intelligent person.

Indeed.

Quote

In a Society in which there is no law, and in theory no compulsion, the only arbiter of behaviour is public opinion. But public opinion, because of the tremendous urge to conformity in gregarious animals, is less tolerant than any system of law. When human beings are governed by "thou shalt not", the individual can practise a certain amount of eccentricity: when they are supposedly governed by "love" or "reason", he is under continuous pressure to make him behave and think in exactly the same way as everyone else. - George Orwell

Non-aggression principle: Thou Shalt not use force, the threat of force, or fraud against another person or their property.

Behold the fruits of fundamentalism! You have lost the power to interpret text without greatly distorting it. If I had not picked a libertarian author, you would have offered a very different interpretation. What a sad state you are in. Not able to think independently any more.

Let's look at the context. It is from his essay on Gulliver's Travels.
http://www.george-orwell.org/Politics_vs._Literature:_An_Examination_of_Gulliver's_Travels/0.html

Quote

Gulliver's master is somewhat unwilling to obey, but
the "exhortation" (a Houyhnhnm, we are told, is never COMPELLED to do
anything, he is merely "exhorted" or "advised") cannot be disregarded.
This illustrates very well the totalitarian tendency which is explicit in
the anarchist or pacifist vision of Society. In a Society in which there
is no law, and in theory no compulsion, the only arbiter of behaviour is
public opinion. But public opinion, because of the tremendous urge to
conformity in gregarious animals, is less tolerant than any system of
law. When human beings are governed by "thou shalt not", the individual
can practise a certain amount of eccentricity: when they are supposedly
governed by "love" or "reason", he is under continuous pressure to make
him behave and think in exactly the same way as everyone else. The
Houyhnhnms, we are told, were unanimous on almost all subjects. The only
question they ever DISCUSSED was how to deal with the Yahoos. Otherwise
there was no room for disagreement among them, because the truth is
always either self-evident, or else it is undis-coverable and
unimportant. They had apparently no word for "opinion" in their language,
and in their conversations there was no "difference of sentiments". They
had reached, in fact, the highest stage of totalitarian organization, the
stage when conformity has become so general that there is no need for a
police force.

Now what is your misinterpretation?