Quote from: Lauda on February 11, 2016, 04:01:24 PM

Quote from: bargainbin on February 11, 2016, 03:55:01 PM

Nah, it doesn't represent the miners OR the pool operators.
Same pool operators were pro-core after LukeJr. threatened them, then pro-Classic when the threat proved to be trolling, now again pro-Core after having been granted a seat @ Bitcoin Bilderberg Group.

Keep drinking the kool-aid. Classic is DOA.

Quote from: bargainbin on February 11, 2016, 03:55:01 PM

Nah, it doesn't represent the miners OR the pool operators.

When you "have the support of the pools", they are important and represent all the miners, but when you don't then they aren't and don't represent anything. You're making it too obvious and easy. Roll Eyes

Only suggesting that the miners (pool operators) will say whatever suits the moment. Real, rational human beings can't possibly bounce from one extreme to the other thrice within a month.
The whole thing is fueled by [petty] backroom dealings & [equally petty] posturing, making it painfully clear how Bitcoin really works; that Bitcoin's consensus mechanism is a muddled junkie's pipe dream. Though, I concede, somewhat funnier & less practical.