Quote from: chennan on February 11, 2016, 07:07:42 PM

1. Really? No issue at all to speak of? ; 2. Agree to disagree ; 3. If you are saying that 1 & 2 are true, then why would there be a need for a "copy-paste" from Core... What exactly are you talking about? If there is no issue at hand, then there wouldn't be a "debate" at all... Huh

There is most certainly a debate.

1. There is no issue right now. Transactions are going through and the network is functioning properly. Is this not the case?
2. Saying "agree to disagree" doesn't invalidate my claim, it just tells me that you have no arguments. A 2 MB block size proposal is not a solution, it is kick of the can down the road.
3. You do realize that the development is not solely focused on the scaleability? Their announcement states the following:

Quote

In parallel, we will focus development on features that have been requested by miners and companies for a long time now, and that will help Bitcoin scale on-chain:
Faster block validation, Faster block propagation

By "focus development" do they just mean "copy more vigorously"?

Quote from: chennan on February 11, 2016, 07:07:42 PM

Look, I know this has been discussed for a while... and from what I'm gathering is that you are in support to allow this "round table" to be the only ones who have their voices heard, and to have this "round table" be the only ones to fix and build "the spaceship going to the moon" that you have quoted before, comparing them to the "well informed engineers" and us to "tax payers".

I never said that the people who signed that statement were engineers.