Quote from: jayce on February 12, 2016, 06:41:34 AM

Quote from: JackpotRacer on February 12, 2016, 06:08:39 AM

Quote from: jayce on February 12, 2016, 05:45:50 AM

Quote from: JackpotRacer on February 12, 2016, 05:25:00 AM

inactive apps are inactive apps as the word is telling us and there is no reason to show inactive apps. it should be easy to filter inactive apps out

apps containing the word "test" or free domains should'nt be shown and filtered out

The parameter to filter all these inactive apps is abit hard to code. Example if you put a parameter of X number of bets in one week then most sites wil be inactive however if someone put some bets on the site then the site will be listed as active again therefore the parameter is abit troublesome

there is no need to code the filter regarding zero bets and keep it simple (in case coding a filter for zero bets is troublesome)

just let app owners tell MP which app has not even one bet in last 7 days and take those apps out. and if the app owner does not want to be taken off the list he can do some bets as most app owners doing some bets on their apps anyway.

we told Ryan that coining a dice had for 2 month not even one bet and he did not take it off the featured list Sad

players should decide and not MP which app they want to play

Then the owner will have absolute power of this issue, moneypot is an app that reflect decentralized so doing this will make the site has absolute power of what it decides. Although that ryan may not make this as his intention but the current set up for moneypot is pretty much reflect decentalization

maybe we misunderstood each other. I mean that MP will give the rules and filter and each app owner can act according to the filter. that would mean that each app owner can decide if he wants to be on the featured list. an app that does not have one bet in xxx days has no right to be on the featured list.