Quote from: erok on February 13, 2016, 04:26:52 AM

Quote from: RyanOlstren on February 13, 2016, 04:21:54 AM

Quote from: smooth on February 13, 2016, 04:16:33 AM

You issued this:

https://blog.shadowproject.io/2016/02/12/deanonymize-shadow-nope/

"We would like you -our dedicated users- to know that, after 10+ hours of testing by Shadows core developers, our team has not yet managed to deanonymize any private transaction."

If so, then you either lied about your core developers being unable to write a few lines of code in a 10 hours, or they aren't able to do so.I don't know which.

This coin will never have credibility because the devs are incompetent and the community is slime.

I remember they viciously fudded other coins for the content of their roadmaps, nitpicking on technicalities.

And here, through gross incompetence, the devs jeopardize the safety (yes safety) of every person who used their "anonymous" system.

I know my post will get deleted because of the intellectual dishonesty of the devs, but hopefully it will stand long enough for a few others to read it.

LOL talks about credibility while posting on a troll account! Worst case scenario we switch back to the ring sig from before.

I'm not positive but I think both ring sig versions have the flaw.

The code can be fixed, going forward. Incompetence is harder to fix.