Quote from: Lauda on February 13, 2016, 02:12:18 PM

Quote from: BitUsher on February 13, 2016, 02:08:37 PM

[/b]Even after being corrected you seem impervious to reading and taking in new information regardless of that new information being a solution that is available now which directly addresses the capacity you so demand.

He does this all the time. Have you not noticed it before?

Yes, I have noticed it coming from a bunch of classic supporters.(Clarify -Not All, Gavin, Jeff, Ver all appear reasonable) . I don't want to appear paranoid , but it does give a bit of credence to the potential of some Agent provocateurs with old accounts attempting to subvert and disrupt our ecosystem.

Quote from: BitUsher on February 13, 2016, 01:05:42 AM

I believe their are many genuine bitcoin advocates who support Classic(including some prominent anarchists like Ver and Janssens so this isn't about Statists vs Anarchists), and that the trolls and agent provocateurs aren't just representing the classic side but multiple groups for various reasons. One likely reason is to subvert our ecosystem. Here is a good video giving you an overview on how states subvert organizations they oppose - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fQoGMtE0EY

I do think that it is possible that States are still ignoring and simply watching our ecosystem from the sidelines as they have already admitted towards...who knows? The beauty of subversion is that it is extremely difficult to avoid or identify and those that claim that it is happening are accused of being paranoid. The good thing is that we can avoid its effects by increasing education and trying not to automatically assume ill will , and sticking to the facts as best we can to avoid it if it is happening.

P.S... No I am not insinuating Franky is an Agent provocateur ... there is no way for me to know what motivates his resistance to having a rational discussion and addressing the facts.