Quote from: Lauda on February 15, 2016, 10:02:43 PM

Quote from: mexxer-2 on February 15, 2016, 07:10:55 PM

Quote from: Mitchełł on February 15, 2016, 07:08:42 PM

SebastianJu, you were temporarily banned because you kept making multiple posts in a row, which that could have been posted in one. You have been warned about this before and having a paid signature doesn't help.

I remember telling him the same , sometime after Nov. apparently he didn't get the message.

I've warned him about this at least on 1 occasion. I was ignored at that point in time as well. The ban was well deserved and there is not much more that can be added.. I don't see a valid reason for one to make consecutive posts in this case, especially not when involved in a signature campaign. I would advise the OP one more time to avoid this in the future.

Now I remember that it was you who warned me. Well, i guess i did not realize that you are staff at that time. I thought it was a personal opinion rather than a rule to follow. Roll Eyes

My bad.

Quote from: The Pharmacist on February 16, 2016, 12:28:06 AM

Quote from: mexxer-2 on February 15, 2016, 07:40:10 PM

Quote from: redsn0w on February 15, 2016, 07:34:53 PM

it's all about the sig. ad (nothing else).

Yep, oh the freedom us non-camapigners have... Grin

OK, this is very good to know and I'm quite surprised that SebastianJu got temp banned. Guess I shouldn't be, right? Then again, a lot of other users do much the same thing, Spoetnik and Gleb Gamow in particular come to mind. Yes this is off topic, but that Cryptsy thread was spam city between the two of them. Anyhow hope you can cope with this, SJ. Learn from it.

Already done. My personal opinion about the huge posts that i would have to create now not being read at all didn't change though surely i will follow the rule, now that i know that it is an actual rule. Too bad i had to realize it this way. Sad

Quote from: Quickseller on February 16, 2016, 12:44:35 AM

Quote from: SebastianJu_alt on February 15, 2016, 07:03:23 PM

Regarding prevision... ah no, you wrote you are accused of being an alt of Quickseller, you are online all the time too, being a scambuster and all and today I wrote about why I did not trust all of his negative ratings. Forbid me the thought that your prevision was led by knowledge maybe. I only thought of the possibility, no accusation.

I think it is kinda ridiculous to imply that your ban had anything to do with you (subtlety) speaking out against me,

Yes, sorry about that. You know how one feels when something bad happens... explainations are searched. And since mexxer all the time was around like "told you so", he even warned me some time back before staff warned me, it looked a lot like he might have reported me. I didn't see a reason for that since I never angered him, at least with that username, so i was asking myself why does this happen now. What came to mind was only brace the mace who tried to shortchange someone and besides that only that I slightly criticed you. Leading to the rumour that mexxer might be an alt of you since he acts the same way you did back then.

Sorry again, I would not have written such things when I would have been calm. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Quickseller on February 16, 2016, 12:44:35 AM

similar to how I think it is ridiculous to imply that I give negative trust to anyone who speaks out against me......do you have any idea how many people troll me on a regular basis -- a lot, and a good number of them have never received negative trust from me, although a lot of them are scammers, and were tagged by me in the past -- just because you troll me does not give you a free pass in being a scammer.

I only referred to those claiming that you neg repped them because they spoke out against you and were negrepped when not on default trust. Forget it ok? No hard feelings please. This forum is, at times, already exhausting enough.

Quote from: Quickseller on February 16, 2016, 12:44:35 AM

-- it will probably be fairly rare that it is actually appropriate to make three consecutive posts. You also should probably not respond to the same person across two posts, even if you are responding to two different threads.

I think another valid reason might be that the previous post was older. You need to add something and it needs to be read but it won't be read because there is no update to the thread.

Though i guess admins won't have time to check this and it will be a consecutive post anyway.

I wonder what someone should do when he needs to create an otherwise writeblocked thread to provide infos that should not be disrupted by other peoples post who should use another thread for comments to keep the infos easily readable.

At the moment i don't have a clue if such a thing would be possible at all. I mean can i really risk being banned again for lifetime this time? Well, it would make my life easier for sure since the forum is pretty timeconsuming. Easily seeable by, I believe, 4 big escrows practically leaving in the last weeks. Though I'm here trying to help avoiding scams and hopefully see how bitcoin prosper. I would not want to leave the forum to scammers. Even though i sometimes feel like giving up when the next timeconsuming hurdle shows up. Sad

Quote from: james.lent on February 16, 2016, 01:38:24 AM

Quote from: SebastianJu_alt on February 16, 2016, 01:14:47 AM

Quote from: Mitchełł on February 15, 2016, 07:45:30 PM

Or Grue/BadBear/Theymos and maybe even HilarousAndCo. I can only do so much.

I'm not fully aware of the fineprint of the english language so did you mean that you sent them a pm? If not could you do so?

Thanks in advance!

I think he meant he can only help up to his level best. On regards the un-banning, only Grue/BadBar/Theymos/HilariousAndCo can do something about it.

Ah ok. Well, the thing is i probably can't technically send a pm with my banned account and I guess Iam not allowed to send a pm with this alt-Account. So I would have to depend on someone other sending one. Or can I?

Quote from: brace the mace on February 16, 2016, 04:15:08 AM

Quote from: Lutpin on February 16, 2016, 04:06:49 AM

Quote from: brace the mace on February 16, 2016, 04:05:21 AM

One of the most trust worthy escrows in the forum gets banned for signature spam, classy. :p

And the guy who recently had some troubles with him comes up to twist the knife in the wound, surprising.

Hey, I ain't twistin' any knifes here. Don't you find it funny that a guy who claims to have escrowed 8k bitcoins was spamming for a signature campaign? I do.

You really want me to protect you? Roll Eyes

Well, have fun on my cost... i won't turn scammy or try to shortchange others only because it could be highly rewarding. I prefer being able to look into the mirror. And i escrow because there are too many that think differently.

Besides, spamming is a hard word for my post quality. Well, it's defined that way on the forum now regardless of the content. Hopefully more are aware of this now.