Quote from: TradeFortress on December 11, 2012, 11:48:19 AM

Quote from: CasinoBit on December 11, 2012, 11:10:33 AM

Quote from: giantdragon on December 11, 2012, 02:30:20 AM

I want to remind again that Casinobit admin is misleading about 100% payout! Having 2 zeroes on the roulette gives him 5.26% advantage.

The roulette shouldn't even be there at the moment, everything is being remade.

Quote from: TradeFortress on December 11, 2012, 01:20:30 AM

Quote from: CasinoBit on December 11, 2012, 12:49:36 AM

Quote from: Junko on December 10, 2012, 10:58:44 PM

PR/Marketing fail itt

More like competitors trolling me but meh, it's currently in the first testing stages and we don't really care to introduce the bitcoin community to the casino. We care more about introducing people from the gambling community who are new to bitcoin to the casino.

Your game needs to be provably fair before any sane person plays it.

There is no such thing. We could show that the game on the main page probably provably fair like Satoshi. The rest of casinos are BSing about provable fairness, we might as well MD5 hash the current millisecond and provide the string to the user as "evidence".

I'm not sure how you think the rest of the casinos are BSing about provable fairness. THEY ARE NOT. SIMPLE EXAMPLE:

Lucky Number ranges from 1 to 100. If it's less than 50, you win 2x!

SITE has a secret. Say "foo". Now if they tell the secret, then people can calculate the lucky number. So they HASH it with something like SHA256 and tell you that.

YOU has a secret too. Say "bar". You give the secret to SITE. Now site will know your lucky number since they combine your secret, with their secret. However they cannot change their secret now since they already gave you the hash.

Now do you understand it?

You might say, but the site knows their secret! What if they played the game THEMSELVES? They'd knew what PLAYER secret to use to win! But the only point of that is you're SCAMMING THE GAME. However if 10% of the "game" is owned by outside investors, then you can scam them. So yeah, satoshidice can scam their shareholders but not you.

What stops people from paralleling the SHA256 hashing on many ALUs, like GPUs for example and bruteforcing the key?

Quote from: dooglus on December 11, 2012, 12:14:21 PM

Quote from: CasinoBit on December 11, 2012, 11:10:33 AM

Quote from: giantdragon on December 11, 2012, 02:30:20 AM

Your game needs to be provably fair before any sane person plays it.

The rest of casinos are BSing about provable fairness.

What do you mean by that? Is it that you don't understand how provable fairness works, or have you found some way the sites can cheat despite their so-called provable fairness? If so, could you please point out how?

How do you propose provable fairness will be implemented in Texas Holdem except using mental poker?