Quote from: ChartBuddy on February 19, 2016, 12:00:59 AM

Coin

Explanation

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 19, 2016, 12:01:46 AM

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 18, 2016, 11:42:42 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 18, 2016, 11:37:43 PM

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 18, 2016, 11:05:07 PM

Wall Street doesn't give a toss about decentralization. If it turns out the market doesn't either, eventually a competing hard fork will take Core's place.

Smallblockers want to maintain node decentralization by centralizing code development.

I don't see any way to decentralize code development. Competing protocols doesn't seem to be the answer.

Why not? As long as we're talking 75% supermajority and a grace period to upgrade before mining incompatible blocks, what's the problem? A few people may not get the upgrade memo in time? THAT's your big objection?

Elections are messy, expensive and inefficient. Would you prefer a government without them?

I guess, I don't know. I'd have to read more about how political concepts apply to open-source projects.

What's this got to do with Soccer??