Quote from: bitcoin carpenter on February 20, 2016, 05:02:22 PM

Quote from: agusmf on February 20, 2016, 03:04:09 PM

I'm not really sure how to
value Vanillacoin at the
moment. If the insta send
method doesn't have any
security holes (if), then that
would provide some increased utility, but transactions still
need to be included in a block.
So I guess you get faster
speeds only while the network
is low traffic and if applied to
Bitcoin, wouldn't give any gains if blocks are perma full
since you would want to wait
until the transaction is actually
inside a block?

You should read up on lightning networks and Zerotime.

Dude why don't you come off your high horse. I have researched LN intensively. I read the white paper. I watched a very long video where the creators explained the issues.

That you equate Zerotime to LN shows you don't have a fucking clue about the technology.

Do you guys even have a fucking clue whom you are talking to? Huh

?? Do you think your ignorance can match someone who has been coding and doing computer science research for 30 years. You guys are just pathetic.

LN is totally different technological concept from Zerotime.

Quote from: bitcoin carpenter on February 20, 2016, 05:02:22 PM

Limitations of blocksize does not directly related this way. VNL can do 100's of tps and Zerotime can add 100x's more tps without filling the blocksize as it is right now. Along with this VNL is set to have pruning and scaling of the block chain in place. Blocksize is never going to be an issue with vnl.

Pruning has nothing to do with scaling the tx/sec rate. And you don't even comprehend why I said Zerotime won't scale. It is just n00b garbage that you are slobbering.

Quote from: bitcoin carpenter on February 20, 2016, 05:02:22 PM

blah blah blah nonsense

Everything you write is wrong. Wrong, Wrong Wrong.

You idiots enjoy fist fucking each other because you are going to be selling VNL bags to street children in exchange for used bottle caps.