Quote from: Kazuldur on February 21, 2016, 03:26:07 PM

Quote from: BitcoinFuture99 on February 21, 2016, 03:17:43 PM

You are right but Like Payment service providers FaucetBOX should look into security of owners by implementing verification of faucet users by Identification cards or Home bills.

I don't know any payment service that does that, it's the end service (in our case: each faucet) that does such verifications, at least in Europe. Also that would pretty much kill all the traffic, no one would use faucets then.

Quote from: BitcoinFuture99 on February 21, 2016, 03:17:43 PM

Also in Future faucetbox Security Every payouts made by Faucetbox to users should be first verified by the owners of the faucets. Owners may find out some suspicious transaction. Little time limit should be provided to owners to check it.

FaucetBOX.com must not only protect the security of owners, but also users. And as owners notoriously accuse legit users of being bots or hackers, I believe that would do more harm than good. Also that overlaps with the security provided by limiting how much can be withdrawn in a 30-minute timeframe. Prevention is the key.

I think users have no security issue here. Maximum the amount paid to the user less will they have to pay as fees when they spend it So little bit delayed will have no issue. 13000 Satoshi x 7 Payments will amount to more than 70000 Satoshi of miner fees . Like for Payaza Pay Pal etc verification is must thing now