Quote from: sase007 on February 22, 2016, 07:34:46 PM

Quote from: shorena on February 22, 2016, 05:47:43 PM

Quote from: sase007 on February 22, 2016, 05:42:17 PM

I have recently been given neutral trust rom Lutpin and negative trust from another user (who appears to be some sort of apprentice as he has positive trust from LutPin but has been moved out of Default Trust).

I had no idea that I couldn't make my own judgement to decide what to request when offering a loan. That (by the way) was only worth $5, so if I feed the scammer I haven't really lost anything and I already have his account held in collaterall.

Does anyone else think these people have given me negative trust for an insufficiant reason. (the lender is left to decide what they accept as "valid collaterall" (hence why it is left unexplained intentionally in the lending rules)).

Same old discussion, you want to make your own decisions, but lutpin may not make their own decisions when leaving the rating? Is it factually wrong? Does it hinder you in any way besides your ego?

It does actually. It does have no impact on my ego but it could have an impact on acceptance onto some signature campaigns and trades that I want to do in the future.

Pm blazed to remove this user from his trustlist.