Re: Crazy shit Bible says, crazy shit Christians say

The existence of Santa Clause can be disproven, but the existence of God can only be speculated.

I'd love to see this proof... considering it's impossible

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence#Proving_a_negative

Quote

In 1992 during a presentation at Caltech, skeptic James Randi said "you can't prove a negative". He claims that he cannot prove a negative (such as that telepathy does not exist), but he argues that an individual who claims telepathy exists must prove it...

Santa was created by the Coca-Cola company

Santa is 300+ years older than the Coca-Cola company

You're right, I retract my statement. Santa Clause still does have an origin and story based off people who existed in time, my point is still valid.

You said you could DISPROVE Santa

He's dead, I win.

So is God, I win

How can you say this when you can't prove he ever existed?

Didn't your God died on the cross?

No, that would be God's begotten Son. Don't get it twisted.

Who is one with his Father. Son/Father/And Holy spirit, you forgot the mantra. They all died on the cross.

You misunderstand: God created the angels, Jesus was one of them, he sent Jesus to Earth, we crucified him.

What Christian denomination are you?

Jesus was God's son and God himself. Holy trinity (son+father+holy spirit) that is what Roman Catholics thought me.

So according to their twisted logic, the whole trinity died on the cross. Like three Musketeers. One for all, all for one.

Quote from: Moloch on February 23, 2016, 07:21:36 AM

Quote from: -XXIII- on February 23, 2016, 07:20:15 AM

Quote from: Moloch on February 23, 2016, 07:18:43 AM

Quote from: -XXIII- on February 23, 2016, 07:17:03 AM

You misunderstand: God created the angels, Jesus was one of them, he sent Jesus to Earth, we crucified him.

You misunderstand your own dogma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity

Quote

The Christian doctrine of the Trinity defines God as three consubstantial persons, expressions, or hypostases: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit; "one God in three persons". The three persons are distinct, yet are one "substance, essence or nature".

By that same article: "According to this central mystery of some Christian faiths," which means, some, not all.

Name a denomination that does not believe in the Trinity

I have no denomination, but I believe in righteousness and have a strong moral code. What you folks are doing is purely hateful, calling out others for the sake of attacking them and their beliefs.
I'm ashamed to share this forum with you.

Good for you. So do I.

You might have a strong moral code, but that code is not from the Bible. It is based on what you as a person believe is producing least suffering. That is what most normal people use as basis for their moral code. There are of course cultural influences as well.

Again nothing to do with a bronze age story book. At least I hope you are not getting moral code from it.

We are not hateful, we are just pointing out the obvious nonsense.

You can't sit there and assume you know my upbringing. I've come to learn my moral code is pretty damn close to the bible, and whether or not that's true is irrelevant. What you are doing is hateful, like calling someone "nonsense". That's an attack. You're a shit-disturber, nothing more.

Of course it is an utter nonsense. Is is not an attack, it is stating the obvious.
It is a collection of bronze age stories, very vile stories. Read it all the way to the end. By the time you are done, you'll be an Atheist.

Why does it offend you? Why you think it is hateful? I don't understand. The book was written by 40 bronze age cave dwellers over the course of 1500 years. Look it up. Why would you think it is anything else? The vile verses are in the OP. Read them for yourself in your own copy.