Quote from: Zarathustra on February 23, 2016, 07:12:59 PM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 23, 2016, 07:01:04 PM

Quote from: VeritasSapere on February 23, 2016, 06:56:54 PM

Quote from: hdbuck on February 23, 2016, 06:48:27 PM

Yea yea here we go again with the political philosophy..

In the end you expressed yourselves switching to Classic xt or whatever... such freedom.

We all agree not to agree, sounds lika consensus to me. Grin

If that is your conception of consensus then I can agree with that. What consensus means as a governance model in the literal sense of the word is that essentially any changes become impossible. If changes require true consensus then change becomes completely impossible since there will always be a few people that disagree, regardless. Not how I perceive the governance of Bitcoin but if that is how you perceive it then I can at least respect the consistence of your believes.

Dont worry, shifting consensus will likely be reached if bitcoin's very existence would directly be threaten, as in security wise for example.

But coinbase or other mainstream matters are not vital for bitcoin. Sorry (for their loss).

You are not vital for Bitcoin. Coinbase is.

Sure, im not, but still they arent either...

In fact we all arent, and even the internet isnt. Wink