Quote from: E on February 23, 2016, 07:02:46 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on February 23, 2016, 05:30:24 PM

https://blockchain.info/tx/df60741e004f63c13d07eb422f89b3fbc1a2b270cccd35c05d0daeb35af5f20f

now 10 blocks have skipped the .0013 fee transaction due to it having 52 small parts of coin and 3 big parts.
thus 55 parts of coin which takes up space so it gets skipped.

even though the fee is .0013 I got skipped here for this block.

These funds were sent to me and there are 3 big parts in the send about 7.5 and 52 small parts around 0.05

This is tough as small payments take up space and the large fee of .0013 is not big enough.

I know you understand all of the following, and your comment is about daily vs. blockly payouts, but even in this case (55 inputs) the fee is really reasonable:

Your transaction was over 11KB -- suggested fee for inclusion in next 0-1 blocks is sat50/byte, or 0.0057 for your transaction. That's about 0.07% of the transaction amount.

Your included fee of 0.0013 is sat11/byte, which 21.co currently estimates means a delay of around 14 blocks.

It's a change from the past, I agree -- and I am a 2MB HF now supporter, running a Classic node since 3 Feb, but I think your original fee was too low for the market conditions.

So I got caught on sends due to this more then once. So I know to send high fees when the coin in my wallet is 35 or 50 x .01 from mining here.

A lot of of people sending to me don't know this issue so they send decent coin and think it is enough. Then everything bogs down for hours or worse sends just fail.