Quote from: TwitchySeal on February 24, 2016, 10:43:45 AM

Quote from: poplolnman on February 24, 2016, 10:41:39 AM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on February 24, 2016, 10:07:33 AM

Quote from: troubled_times on February 24, 2016, 10:05:00 AM

The dealer did not Blackjack also.
The dealer had a 3 card 21, not a Blackjack.

I know. The second part is just a mistake I found.

Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push
Player BJ + Dealer 21 = Player Win

We know this, they don't.

Everyone know about that basic rules. I think it's more likely to technical fault which it's accidentally or we can say it's a bug? Mistaken algorithm.
Never happened to me the case like this btw, i just wish fj could clarify and solve this problem asap .

Well according to their rules Player BJ + Dealer BJ = Player Lose

So maybe not.

Quote from: troubled_times on February 24, 2016, 10:43:17 AM

You cannot even check the bets on their provably fair system to see the cards.
They are fabricating a lie saying that the dealer had a blackjack on bet id : 8447318

FJ better get their shit together before dooglus catches wind...

I think someone should look into it, you type in your BET ID and it just refreshes the page. This gives FortuneJack the opportunity to fabricate any lie they want about hands if you do not have a screenshot of the issue you're emailing about. This is shady, very shady on FortuneJacks behalf.