Quote from: mexxer-2 on February 25, 2016, 09:35:19 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 25, 2016, 08:12:51 PM

I agree 100%, if you make your ratings without anything solid behind them, you will find yourself removing them ever so often, In a few days we will see him and luptin removing another one of their feedback from anonymous22's page, he already sent his method to someone trusted for review

Alright , you've got me in a loop. So while you're saying, I may be trust abusing by negging someone clearly suspicious, I also can't remove that rating if my suspicion was proved false by a solid proof and a confirmation from a DT 1 member, and if the latter happens I should be removed from DT.
Also remember how many times the existing(been in DT for at least) DT "scam busters" have gulped down their suspicion and removed the neg, only after a community-wide request? Most of which generally gets ignored? I am offering the individual a chance to prove my and three other individuals' suspicion wrong, which I believe is a fair chance.

Quote from: shorena on February 25, 2016, 08:57:20 PM

- I disagree with the positive ratings for "HateLeague" members at least with the current wording. I think the wording should be more clear and the name of the group removed. I wouldnt lose my mind over it though.

Yeah, I'm thinking of putting whywefight's rating on neutral for the moment, from what I know he doesn't care either way. Seems no one is getting the joke at all, and are just going head over heels thinking of it as a team which negs anyone remotely suspicious. Which sounds cool and all, but not worth going over the trouble of replying to every stupid comment taking the joke seriously.

Quote from: Heutenamos on February 25, 2016, 09:10:31 PM

anybody could do that,give me one day's time and i will dig 5 year old ponzi thread and tag the OP.The question the abuse.

Cool, tell you what, go and do so for around 5 months with no possibility of being added to DT, face 10s of pages of offensive message even when your ratings have no effect. I highly doubt you're going to do this just to prove a point and given your "Everything, scams, fraud , illegal stuff is cool. Government and the law is just nothing but someone trying to control you" attitude, I hardly believe you're going to tag even 10(of course you might now, just because this sounds like a challenge).

Quote from: The Pharmacist on February 25, 2016, 09:17:10 PM

I agree with this and I would add that what you said is even more true in this bct culture that apparently breeds long term scammers. Ones that cultivate trust before scamming. If you can earn trust just by tagging scammers, that's the absolute easiest way of doing it. Should I trust someone just because he accurately does this? People still trust QS so I suppose it's to be expected around these parts but it's dumb practice.

DT ain't = trustworthy, its an individual whose ratings you trust. I've probably repeated this many times, but you have the option to kick DT out of your trust list. (Not intended towards The Pharmacist)Also it fits my definition of ironical, don't know about you guys: --crap-- forgot what I was gonna even say

You can say all you want about how DT isnt trustworthy, the fact of the matter is that it is forced upon the forum's users and therefore should be regulated

Also, you are not offering people choices, when their reputations are on the line you are forcing them