Quote from: bargainbin on February 25, 2016, 11:53:54 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 25, 2016, 11:40:15 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on February 25, 2016, 09:47:18 PM

if you small blocker truly believe the shit you say you should from a group that wishes to lower block limit to 0.5MB.

you'll get more decentralization and security, for everything else there's the Lighting Network promiseland.

That's not really a sound logical extension, Adam.

I wouldn't characterize myself as a "small blocker," but it does seem that the large majority of the core view seems to be a fairly decent and reasonable road forward...

I am very sympathetic with Core in a lot of ways... especially in regards to questioning the need and/or the emergency that is put in front of us by the proposals involving XT and Classic and some of the seeming purposeful contention contained in those roadmaps to suggest that a hardfork is the only way to go and to call into question bitcoin's status quo governance in a kind of coo approach.

Anyhow, beginning with Seg wit and then reconsidering to take one step at a time, seg wit is deployed along the way... as what the next step should be.

It's uncanny. No matter how I shuffle the words around, your post reads exactly the same.

That's called a reading comprehension deficit.

I believe I had that when I was a kid, and when I used to read, but did not really understand the points that were being made.

A potential bright side is that if you work at it, there is a decent possibility that you will be able to improve, so long as you put some effort into it, and attempt to recognize some of your challenged areas.