Quote from: iCEBREAKER on February 25, 2016, 11:49:59 PM

Quote from: canth on February 25, 2016, 11:41:04 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on February 25, 2016, 11:37:38 PM

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 25, 2016, 11:31:36 PM

Quote from: Cconvert2G36 on February 24, 2016, 11:18:21 PM

... "I'll make him an offer he can't refuse."

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on February 25, 2016, 10:20:38 PM

Quote from: macbook-air on February 25, 2016, 09:49:28 PM

We are currently under DDoS counterattack.

Fixed it for you.

Mess with the honey badger and you get the claws. Plus the teeth.

Scumbag tactics from the "economic majority". Roll Eyes

Color me unsurprised.

Scumbag tactics? You mean like attempting to force a contentious hard fork at a 75/25 split with only 28 days warning, while using FUD as a thin wedge to insert a governance coup?

Don't cry to me when you poke the Honey Badger and he rips your face off. You knew that was bound to happen. Remember XT? LAAAWL!

The HK meeting was far more effective at getting agreement than a few bits sent at mining pools or nodes. The day when Bitcoin needs individuals to perform DDoS attacks to survive is a day when the Honey Badger is on life support.

Honey Badger doesn't need to rip your face off if you tickle him. That's just how he rolls.

Write his obituary if it makes you feel better about delicate snowflake Classic's utter lack of antifragility. He doesn't really give a damn.

My opinion is that there is no relevance between DDoS, Honey Badgers and Classic - it's all just a semi-annoying by-product of individuals who feel their ideology is threatened. If the network users decide that there are to be larger blocks, there will be larger blocks. If not, there won't be. XT died because end users said so.

A HF to 2MB blocks in 2016 is debatable at this point. In 2017, I think that most agree it's happening one way or another.