Quote from: Zeke2345 on February 26, 2016, 09:15:00 PM

The forum has a tendency to go looking for dirt and cross some ones opinion out because of one aspect or another.
It could be my spelling or choice of words,this case a random sale. But I should mention that I was drawn to the thread initially because those sales did happen recent and was wondering what the deal might be with those amazon cards.
Figured it out but left disturbed that a group fancies harassing in private message those that are using the forum to make sales.
This does not change anything for me,maybe those that read but Its all out there for anyone to look into.

Well you don't come close to untrustworthy in my book if thats what you mean

Quote from: mexxer-2 on February 25, 2016, 10:17:03 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 25, 2016, 10:11:26 PM

So if someone offers a 30% discount then he is untrustworthy?
give me a yes or no answer

Sad you take extreme approaches at certain things, it has been repeated by EcuaMobi that he considers many factors before being suspicious of an individual. If the discount was given for
1) Unlimited period of time
2) For more than 5 GC
3) The user has a shady history

Hell no, I'm not letting my post hide cryptodevil's

Quote from: cryptodevil on February 26, 2016, 09:17:04 PM

Quote from: Zeke2345 on February 26, 2016, 07:40:32 PM

So we have a topic about trust abuse and here we are going after a member because they do not want to disclose who they are.

No, dont be dishonest, the OP has failed to even make a coherent case for his claim about there being an abuse of the trust system. What we have instead is a rambling diatribe employing fallacious reasoning and ad hominem complaint about how the commercial issuers of gift cards are apparently fully aware they are open to abuse but don't care, as though that is a reasonable defense of dishonest behaviour, even if it were true, which is highly unlikely.

Then, when the sock-puppet's posts in this thread are challenged for being utterly void of merit and lacking in substance, we see him and other, equally vapid contributors to this discussion, try to claim there is a fucking 'cultural' issue and that they are being 'attacked'.

The only people being put 'on the defensive' here are the assholes who clearly don't like the trust system being used for the purpose it exists for, namely, communicating to other forum users the referenced proof of a user's dishonest behaviour.