Quote from: Rudd-O on December 18, 2012, 10:28:54 PM

Quote from: Dalkore on December 18, 2012, 10:19:59 PM

Quote from: Rudd-O on December 16, 2012, 11:15:54 PM

Quote from: Rassah on December 16, 2012, 10:33:49 PM

Hey, all you guys claiming that AnCap may lead to things like bit powerful companies using their strengths to bully the little guy

Statists resort to this belief as a form of fearmongering. It is, of course, a lie. They can't possibly know whether this would happen in a stateless society, and we know this is so, because whenever they want to "prove" their belief, what do they do? They bring up examples of statist societies, where the examples of organizations who supposedly are "very dangerous" have, in fact, been empowered by (you guessed it) a state.

It's nothing but projection, see? Statists project the fact that in their statist system, they support the accumulation of murderous power in the organized criminals doing business as "government", who, of course, trample on the little guy as much as they want. They pretend this is a form of "protection", but, of course, it isn't protection any more than any other Mafia charging you "protection money" to "protect your business from burning down".

Their whole "argument" boils down to "I want the strangers I worship to kill / cage / rob me if I disobey them, because I am scared of strangers killing / caging / robbing me". Anyone with two brain cells to rub together understands how pathologically lunatic this Livestockholm Syndrome is. It is a classic example of projection of abuse to deny their own abuse.

No point in debating someone with their mind made up, so disrespectful and assuming.

See, you call me names (not the first time, by the way), but you never actually bother responding to arguments (mine or others') with valid rebuttals. Yes, I've seen your posts. You pretend to have a debate, but then you respond to arguments by calling them names all the time, and if that doesn't shut your interlocutor up, you call them names directly. You try to pretend that your interlocutor "is not listening" or "does not want to have a debate", when those empty complaints of yours describe your very behavior. I have yet to see a valid rebuttal coming from you... and I'm kind of tired of waiting for that, and seeing cheap stalling tactics instead.

You're going straight to my ignore list. This is not a punishment -- I simply do not need to read your anti-contributions to the boards.

I will post this so other can read this:

1. No point in debating someone with their mind made up, so disrespectful and assuming - This is a fact is not calling you a name? If so, what name?

2. If anyone cares, read the 2 posts I didn't respond two and tell me I should allow myself respond to such a disrespectful tone?

In closing, I am actually glad Rudd-O ignored me so I don't need to respond to valid questions from people with a lack of patience, tact and general manners in a debate/discussion.