Quote from: RealBitcoin on March 02, 2016, 02:50:15 AM

Another 'network durability stress test' a.k.a 'ddos' a.k.a 'spam' a.k.a 'butthurt bitcoin classic users' ?

Correct. Didn't you notice the shills saying that we need a 2 MB block size limit and that people should run Classic or BU?

Quote from: Cryptology on March 01, 2016, 08:26:41 PM

Agreed. That data points in that direction. In any case for an average bitcoin user it really doesn't matter why block are full.

It shouldn't matter and they should practice sending with proper fees so that in the future they are unaffected (currently only some are due to lower fees).

Quote from: aarons6 on March 02, 2016, 03:53:22 AM

you do know you can buy things on amazon with bitcoin, through purse.io.

That's not the same as directly accepting Bitcoin.

Quote from: nicked on March 02, 2016, 03:32:20 AM

I don't think this is an attack or spam. This is just regular transactions that have what used to be regular fees, that aren't getting confirmed because there is not enough room in the blocks for them all. Raising fees won't fix that. Only a block size increase will do that.

No. This is completely wrong. Did you even take a look at any graphics provided by me or someone else? Please read before posting.