Quote from: trace666 on March 03, 2016, 08:50:36 AM

Quote from: Amph on March 03, 2016, 08:49:03 AM

Quote from: trace666 on March 03, 2016, 08:44:51 AM

Quote from: Amph on March 03, 2016, 07:42:01 AM

the mining fee is divided proportionally by the hash of the miners right? if you have 1/10 of the hash you get 1/10 of the total fee?

No. Only one party (the one mining the block) will get 100% of the money.

wait, how it work with pool then? it must be divided in the end, or the pool get all the money from fees?

The pool gets all the money (25 BTC+fees) and can then distribute the money to its users. Or not, depending on the pool operator and its rules. This is not part of the bitcoin protocol.

that's bad, i thought that the fee's destiny was the same as the reward, they should fix this to prevent centralization of the money when the reward will be worthless

Quote from: Mickeyb on March 03, 2016, 08:52:38 AM

Quote from: Amph on March 03, 2016, 08:49:03 AM

Quote from: trace666 on March 03, 2016, 08:44:51 AM

Quote from: Amph on March 03, 2016, 07:42:01 AM

the mining fee is divided proportionally by the hash of the miners right? if you have 1/10 of the hash you get 1/10 of the total fee?

No. Only one party (the one mining the block) will get 100% of the money.

wait, how it work with pool then? it must be divided in the end, or the pool get all the money from fees?

I think you're confusing Bitcoin protocol with pool rules. The pool first gets the BTC for the block, and might or might not pay the transaction fees as the part of dividends

i'm not confusing, i was convinced that the fee were divided like the block reward, and this is not the case then it should be fixed for the future

otherwise how the miners will survive when the block reward will be pointless?