Removed users:
Unsubstantial posts:
...
I have randomly opened a few of those blacklisted users to see their posts and, at least for those i've looked, they did not look unsubstantial for me.
OFC there are posts and replies; i would like to sugest implementing a minimum word count for a post to be paid. That can be automated.
Now i'm scared of replying when my answer is simple enought and can be considered a 'poor' post.
Well maybe you and me have a different definition of what unsubstantial is. Bothering to stretch out a half-assed sentence with every post isn't substantial. When you check a users post and they're all one liners it is quite obvious this is all they are willing or think they have to do to get paid so they don't bother writing any more. And implementing a minimum character count wont help. Bitmixer has a 75 character one but that's still just a basic sentence so that's all the majority of their users bother to post. You see several people all with a bitmixer sig posting in a row all saying the same crap in one sentence just reworded slightly.
I would like to suggest to campaign that before ban users send a warning to user about posts quality. Tell him what isn't right with his posts and give him one more chance. I saw some posts too, and it wasn't unsubstantial, short answers, but made sense in the thread. If Yobit isn't satisfied with my posts for an example i would like to know why before be banned.
It's just a suggestion. I'm happy with this signature campaign service and i have only positive feedbacks about it. But after that big banned list, i'm a bit afraid...
A couple of months back I spent hours messaging everyone on the campaign to tell them about what is expected. Most didn't listen Rules have been added to the op so anyone shitposting or just reeling off mindless one liners have no excuse.