Though Segwit is independently raising the capacity and has nothing to do with LN besides that LN might need it.
This isn't about capacity, LN
needs Segwit in other ways and is beneficial for it (e.g. reducing blockchain space needed to change channels). You either need to do more research in this area or stop posting about it. False information isn't helping anyone.
Honestly, I don't care about LN since I will never use it and I'm pretty sure it will only turn out to be a ripple 2. I did not write about any benefits LN might have from Segwit. I'm not interested in them and would not elaborate about advantages LN can get from segwit. So I wonder what false informations you mean.
And you only see worst case scenarios.
There are three cases which get considered. However, one has to be prepared for worst case scenarios when scaling large networks. This is what the engineers should be doing, not some optimists without relevant degrees.
Oh right. Now I should shut up because I don't have a degree in economics or something like that? Well, I would prefer to remain on the factual level instead on a personal one.
Surely we have to be prepared for the worst case scenario. That's why I will not support LN. Since it will turn out in the worst case scenario that bitcoin is unuseable for normal usage and LN will turn out to be some kind of bank.
Completely different of everything we bitcoiner wanted bitcoin to be in the last 5 years I'm here.
Though you know there is a huge part of the community that disagrees.
Only a small part of the community disagrees with the current roadmap.
I should not mention something about it. It's pure speculation on both sides. I see opinions written down on both sides and even when my impression would be different from yours... it would only be an impression the same way you judgement is one.