Quote from: anon_giraffe on March 05, 2016, 01:36:03 PM

Quote from: Wilikon on March 05, 2016, 01:32:36 PM

Quote from: anon_giraffe on March 05, 2016, 01:24:53 PM

Quote from: cryptasm on December 17, 2013, 09:39:51 PM

Quote from: Wilikon on December 17, 2013, 09:24:26 PM

So banning should re enforced for the non believers then. Get it. Should we ban all of those who not only do not believe in bitcoin or all of those creating altcoins on bitcointalk?

No they shouldn't be banned, reddit should setup a tinfoil section for the anti-science brigade.

It's not anti-science. It's alternative science offering other hypothesise for the same observations.

Try to explain this to the believers of the Global warming Faith.

Try to explain to this to any one with a strong opinion. It's not an attribute only shared by one side of any large argument.

When even mainstream scientists discuss "the pause," "the hiatus," the fact that there has been no warming in 19 years, and posters to this forum deny that very fact, and refuse to look at the raw satellite data behind it, whatever you want to call it, it's a problem.

If it's a strong opinion, it's such by denying the facts.

Hence, I cannot do other than to conclude Warmers are Deniers.