Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on March 08, 2016, 10:10:00 PM

The problem is, I've seen some of the feedback that you have left, and when i look at the references for some, i dont see how the users are directly posting support

Urgh!
Again with the, "I've seen . . ." and "when I look at . . ." - Evidence or shut the fuck up you tedious infant.

Quote from: leowonderful on March 08, 2016, 11:25:23 PM

Ponzis are all scams and i'm pretty sure everybody in the gambling section knows that if they know anything about doubling anything.

So you defend it on the basis of being 'pretty sure'? How about those pm's I get from people who genuinely didn't understand what they were sending money to? I've also mentioned that there are many users of this forum who struggle to understand English and are prone to misunderstanding what the 'investment' they are getting involved with actually is. So that disproves your weak claim that 'everybody' knows what they are sending money to.

Quote from: The Pharmacist on March 08, 2016, 12:05:00 AM

but you can save it because those tedious rebuttals I've heard so many times before.

So you're saying you are familiar with a reasoned rebuttal but demand that you be allowed to persist with knowingly posting fallacious argument instead because . . .reasons?

Sure, sounds legit.

Quote from: newtons1 on March 09, 2016, 06:21:43 AM

This guy is literally giving negative trust for asking questions in threads that compete with Just-Dice.

This'll be 'literally' as in, 'Completely fabricated assertion', more commonly known as a lie or, colloquially speaking, utter fucking bollocks.

Quote from: newtons1 on March 09, 2016, 06:21:43 AM

cryptodevil

It is not necessary for dooglus to collaborate with you regarding this issue for it to be unethical to allow you to remain on his trust list. For as long as dooglus will benefit from your actions it will be unethical for him to allow you to remain on his trust list.

Hahahaaaa! That is a genuinely funny example of taking mangled reasoning to the extreme, QS. It has to be QS, right? I've only encountered one person on this forum who routinely tries floating those kind of stinkers when lashing out about being held to account for his scammy behaviour and QS is the master of it.