Quote from: runall on March 10, 2016, 04:49:30 AM

pure-ICO? Nxt? Cheesy

Was Nxt not also pure-ICO? I wasn't paying attention to Nxt when it launched, so maybe I got that wrong.

I asked a question about similarities because distribution methods and behavior of investors and community members could be related. I find the premise interesting. Do you disagree? If you do, that is fair enough, as I said I was just asking a question

Quote from: iotatoken on March 10, 2016, 05:11:07 AM

You are blatantly lying about sock accounts. Prove that I got a single sockaccount here and I'll give you all my BTC.

^ More evidence of fucktardary in the form of defensiveness and bullshit right there. I already responded that it wasn't clear to me whether those were the same person or two people repeatedly making the same low-content posts using large type that does nothing at all for your credibility.

As for your pumping or anti-speculation, it was clear to me from before the ICO when you were pushing misleadingly exaggerated claims about the potential of the IOT market and IOTA's likely role in it (and I clearly identified such with specific quotes from your own sources) that you were a pumper.

Your supposed "anti-speculator" statements are almost certainly based on a legal strategy to frame your offering as a product and not an investment. It likely fools very not many (though maybe a few do think you are sincere), and certainly not me.

Independent of all this I do not know whether IOTA will be successful in some manner. It may be. The above should not be construed as criticism of the coin nor of its potential for speculation, as it is not intended that way. It could completely fail to live up to the wildly exaggerated pre-ICO claims of iotatoken and still be very successful (or not)!

When I make a specific recommendation positive or negative on a coin, which I do on rare occasion, I'm very clear about it. This is not one.