Quote from: Andre# on March 13, 2016, 09:44:06 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 12, 2016, 03:12:40 AM

Quote from: Andre# on March 12, 2016, 12:02:23 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 11, 2016, 11:33:09 PM

Of course, you have a right to post in response to whatever you like, and you certainly have plenty of companions in this same thread, in many other forum threads and in redit/bitcoin whining, exaggerating and spreading the same kinds of misinformation about the same topic.

In my thinking it rises to the level of whining because it appears to be deceptive in a variety of ways.

Many of you goofballs engage in all kinds of fancy dancing in order to describe various scares about technical issues that don't really exist because when push comes to shove, you are not really concerned about technical issues (at least those who really understand the matter) but instead just want to whine, whine and whine and you want to insist on a hardfork or some other governance matter, which is really about disrupting while at the same time blaming the other side rather than attempts at resolution of potential technicalities in a reasonable and responsible manner.

Possibly, half of you are paid shills, another 1/3 are misinformed or super emotional. If these supposed technical matters had been presented continuously, argued and evidence set forth as a technical issue, then possibly there may have been some attempt at resolution, but based on the much illogical insistence on hard forks and other blackmailing attempts, i get the sense that technicalities continue to be exaggerated, which seems to be the case whenever looking into any details or evidence in support of technical block limit problem matters.

Furthermore, the next move after seeing multiple flaws in the overall technical arguments, trolls like you tend to want to drag the topic into the weeds in order to distract and divert, when in the end all you seem to want is a hardfork (which gets us back to governance rather than real and concrete technical matters regarding possible problems with the current blocksize limits).

I didn't expect you to resort to name calling after running out of arguments. I guess I overestimated you.

Goodnight.

I don't really consider my comments to you as name calling. I believe that I am just describing the dynamic that causes me to wonder why people seem to be get so worked up in arms regarding this whole matter because it remains very deceptive in its appearance in the pushing of XT and Classic that are something other than they appear to be.

It's quite remarkable that a moderator deleted my "O really?" reply to this post (with the names I was being called marked bold in the above text) for being off-topic, but didn't remove this one I was replying to. Baffling.

I'm not sure what you find so remarkable (or baffling) to have your post removed when you provide a pretty much non-substantive response that merely write 1 or 2 words, a little styling emphasis and clutters the thread with repetition that a moderator may find such a post lacking in value added.

On the other hand, moderator(s) seem to have been quite gracious to you by not removing a lot of your other low quality posts in your line of interchanges with me in recent days (including your above stupid-ass post that seems to merely attempt to draw negative implications regarding moderating practices, and to whine about such and without good reason). Possibly, the moderators have been gracious to allow some of your repetitive posts because even though you have been generally going over the same thing over and over and in different words, at least there arguably had been some substance in some of the points of your earlier posts (I emphasize "arguably"), lame as such substance may have been. Tongue