Quote from: taesup on March 15, 2016, 02:01:32 AM

Hmm I missed the part that this was in reference to PMs.

So in that case, we could actually build a modification where an "imposter" role could be created and people like 0gNasty could be thrown into those roles. When a user is given this role, any interact with that use would come with a big warning label that says something to the affect of "This user is a known imposter. Do not give him your BTC."

This label would show up on his posts, his PM, his profile page, etc. That would be even easier to do and is far more destructive to the imposter and would take less work than trying to figure out if he maliciously edited a quote.

What do you guys think of that idea instead?

I think that idea is largely reactive as opposed to proactive. There are going to be fresh new imposters every day. I think a good solution wouldn't require manual intervention (tagging someone as an imposter).