Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on March 25, 2016, 06:06:34 PM

Quote from: achimsmile on March 25, 2016, 05:57:46 PM

cryptohunter changed it, so that all answer options support his competent opinion.

I recall FrictionlessCoin with his Imagine Fairness threads. And missing him. Today envious trolls are not that hilarious.

The only imagined fairness is in your mind.

Actually though I know even you don't really think the iota ico was well advertised and fair. It's a simple matter to compare it to NXT1.

If you try to compare your ico to ethereum, nem , lisk, you soon start to see that is was totally lacking.

Lisk raised 20x what you did...so either you're terrible at advertising your ico or you wanted a small ico. After NXT1 it was obvious you should have marketed this ICO to the max. You didn't and now you are joining in with the pump threads on the main board when you never hardly mentioned it on here before or during the ICO. Trying to persuade us these tokens should be sold for 30x ico price. What even justifies a 100% increase? not 3000%??
Tangle/dag can be used by any dev this is not your tech only. It has been said it could issues with consensus. The processor claims have been written off as laughable by some. So yeah I see why it has gone from 130 sats ico to 3000-4000 sats. Anyone buying at such prices for such little improvement is crazy.

If you released it on exchanges now it would sink like a stone hence why there is no eta to put it there.

I would stop bumping these threads and get a grip on the "investors" try to pump this on the main board. It is only making iota look more of a scam.

You can't pump it without releasing it to exchange whilst only a very tiny % hold the coin demanding 3000% ico. It's a scam.