Quote from: redsn0w on March 28, 2016, 04:17:48 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on March 28, 2016, 04:10:39 PM

Quote from: redsn0w on March 28, 2016, 04:06:32 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on March 28, 2016, 04:05:24 PM

Quote from: cryptodevil on March 28, 2016, 03:54:40 PM

Oh QS, you *really* need to have your meds reviewed. Either that or start actually taking them as you're supposed to.

Quote from: dooglus on October 26, 2015, 06:09:28 PM

I did help out. The scripts being used were really pretty bad. I fixed a few of the most obvious bugs but not all of them. I personally wouldn't be using these scripts on a live site. They feel like an accident waiting to happen.

Apart from the fact Dooglus wasn't shilling for either the ponzi or the script, it hardly sounds anything like the sort of promotional sales pitch that ponzi-script sellers post

"Hey everyone, I gotta ponzi script for sale. It is full of bugs and I would not recommend using it on a live site as it is an accident waiting to happen!"

Tagging people with negative ratings is about communicating to members whether somebody has behaved in a way which proves them to be dishonest. The evidence you have presented so far suggests quite the opposite about Dooglus. But don't let that stop you obsessing about it some more, which you will.

Dooglus has made his (fixed) ponzi script available for download for anyone who wishes on his GitHub account. Didn't you leave negative trust for someone for selling a ponzi script? What is the difference here?

This is how github works... however as someone said, he doesn't owe money to nobody.

It is not how GitHub works. If I were to create a github account then the script in question would not show up on my account. The script is on dooglus's GitHub account because he worked on it to make it better. Do you seriously think that someone who is improving ponzi scripts as someone who is trustworthy?

I don't think you missed that post but let's quote it another time :

Quote from: dooglus on March 28, 2016, 12:53:53 AM

....
I am not offering Ponzi scripts for download. I forked a crappy Ponzi project on github to fix a bug in it that was costing Klye some money. Github make the script available for download, as they were making it available for download before I forked it. That's how github works.
...

Now you will start to think, I'm supporting dooglus = I support ponzis ... c'mon Quickseller

I did not miss that quote. The improved version of the script was not available prior to Dooglus making said improvements. Furthermore Dooglus helping code the ponzi enabled more ponzi scammers to be able to steal from others because they now have a better working script.

Most importantly, I believe that Dooglus knew the person behind the ponzi that he was helping is a known scammer, and in effect was providing a way for said known scammer to be able to be in possession of other people's money.