Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 08:36:59 AM

why is doo going insane levels to tag people who make a post in the ponzi section?

I'm not. I didn't post much feedback at all recently.

You may be thinking of cryptodevil?

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 08:36:59 AM

to increase the flow in those ponzi which he is working for ? or making the code right so that people lose money ?

I'm not working for a Ponzi. I was looking at the Ponzi script that Klye was using many months ago and saw an obvious bug in it. There was an exclamation mark where there shouldn't be. So I forked the repository and removed the exclamation mark. I also deleted 5 lines of code that weren't needed. That is the sum total of my "contribution" to the script - I deleted 5 lines and an exclamation mark.

Here's the first line I deleted: https://github.com/dooglus/CryptoPonzi/commit/e71472

Here's the next 4 lines and the exclamation mark I deleted: https://github.com/dooglus/CryptoPonzi/commit/6b26cd

Pretty far fetched to call that "working for a Ponzi"!

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 08:36:59 AM

Why he and his list members harass & force users to not to take part into it?

My list members? What list? I don't harass anyone or force anyone to do or not to do anything. If you're referring again to cryptodevil, I think he is only tagging people who are promoting Ponzi schemes. It seems he and I disagree about the scaminess of "honest Ponzis" but overall I think he's doing a good thing in tagging Ponzi promoters.

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 08:36:59 AM

whatever be the reason but both the actions contradict each other.

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 08:36:59 AM

It might be a little off topic but only a retarded motherfucker or a dishonest businessman can say that people who wear a signature or post in a ponzi thread are the scammers or are liable in any sense.

I think you might be offtopic. This thread is for QS to make weird allegations about how I support Ponzis.

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 06:21:03 PM

People posting in those sections might also not have those intentions but he tags them ? all such things fall under "helping the operator"

Again, you're mixing me up with someone else.

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 06:21:03 PM

Though ,I don't have anything personal with doo but i will never support the "abusive behavior".

So don't. Stand up against abuse whenever you see it. I personally don't find it abuse when people who advertize Ponzi scams get negative feedback saying that they advertize Ponzi scams, but if you disagree you are welcome to stand up for the rights of the Ponzi scammers.

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 06:21:03 PM

Doo(a developer) helping an operator fix his script and let his site profit = an MBA(marketing) expert helping an operator fix his business and let his site profit.

Klye was running an honest Ponzi, but using a crappy script to do so. He couldn't figure out what was going wrong with it, so I took a look. I fixed the first bug I found with it, then realised how crappy the script was and recommended that he should stop using it.

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 06:21:03 PM

Everyone should do their due diligence before investing anything in anything is my opinion.

I agree completely.

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 06:21:03 PM

No matter who says it.Observe what is being said.

What is being said here is that I am untrustworthy for fixing a bug in some open source code that I saw.

For me, fixing bugs in open source software is like picking up trash you see on the sidewalk. If everyone did it, we'd have better code and cleaner sidewalks for all. If I see some trash on the sidewalk outside of a known gangster's house I don't refuse to pick it up because someone might accuse me of "supporting" the gangster. I pick it up because it shouldn't be there no matter what. Dumb analogy. Whatever. Check my github account - I've forked lots of projects to make a one-off fix. That's how you make changes to github projects. Fork, edit, merge.

Quote from: CryptoDatabase on March 28, 2016, 09:37:47 PM

Why is it so hard to just delete the repo from github and end this all together?

As Dooglus stated he only fixed it for a person. Well you fixed it so you no longer need it so why is it still there?

Saving it for 'reference' isn't a viable answer as you have stated it can be found elsewhere.

It isn't hard to delete the repo. The only reason I didn't delete it already is that QS would spin that into proof that I have something to hide.

Note that deleting the repo wouldn't "end this all together". No matter what I do QS will continue making a big deal out of this and other assorted imagined wrongdoings forever.

My only two changes:

https://github.com/dooglus/CryptoPonzi/commit/e71472 - Remove unused variable.

Code:

- $adresses = array();

https://github.com/dooglus/CryptoPonzi/commit/6b26cd - Fix getAddress() so it correctly finds the address to which the first input was sent.

Code:

- if ($vinvout == 1)
- $vinvout = 0;
- else
- $vinvout = 1;
-
- $address = $transactionin['vout'][!$vinvout]['scriptPubKey']['addresses'][0];
+ $address = $transactionin['vout'][$vinvout]['scriptPubKey']['addresses'][0];

Hardly worth 'preserving'. Note how every line but one starts with a '-'? That means I deleted lines. The only line without a '-' at the start is where I removed a '!' character.