Quote from: dooglus on March 29, 2016, 06:48:58 AM

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 08:36:59 AM

why is doo going insane levels to tag people who make a post in the ponzi section?

I'm not. I didn't post much feedback at all recently.

You may be thinking of cryptodevil?

No,doo if you dont stop the person in your list and say you completely agree with him then you both are one appeal on this context but with different bodies or color's.

Quote from: dooglus on March 29, 2016, 06:48:58 AM

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 06:21:03 PM

Doo(a developer) helping an operator fix his script and let his site profit = an MBA(marketing) expert helping an operator fix his business and let his site profit.

Klye was running an honest Ponzi, but using a crappy script to do so. He couldn't figure out what was going wrong with it, so I took a look. I fixed the first bug I found with it, then realised how crappy the script was and recommended that he should stop using it.

It's not what you think doo.The rule should be the same for one & all.Either you change your insanity on Ponzi or resign from the position you hold as you contradicted your own believes and principles. Doesn't matters if that was your interest or what but your action supported a Ponzi.

Quote from: dooglus on March 29, 2016, 06:48:58 AM

Quote from: Heutenamos on March 28, 2016, 06:21:03 PM

Everyone should do their due diligence before investing anything in anything is my opinion.

I agree completely.

No you don't.You would have removed CD if you did.

Quote from: CryptoDatabase on March 29, 2016, 07:05:20 AM

Either that policy needs to change or it needs to be applied to everything related to ponzis with no exceptions to it. It is either ok, or it's not ok, there can't be any loopholes or 'overlooked' things.

Going back to QS, it most likely wont end for his part but any validity that he may have had with this thread would be gone if the github repo was just removed. He was full of shit while on DT and is still full of shit to this day.

Exactly.It's not bout the OP saying but doo supported a Ponzi.No loopholes Wink