Quote from: jakiman on March 31, 2016, 11:18:47 AM

Last thing we want is everyone setting up MN's due to significantly larger profit than staking.
That means the actual network will be very vulnerable due to not enough staking going on.

How does staking interest/masternode payouts compare with DASH? Seems like they have incentivized masternodes quite well, but they have larger cost barrier to setting up a masternode. How do we replicate and improve on this with low market cap, possibly transitioning into larger market cap?

Perhaps larger collateral requirements could also be considered. Or maybe addition of supernodes, if necessary to achieve the anon "air gap" would have higher requirements with higher payout. As the POS schedule is long term, if supernodes are likely requirement to achieve true anon then maybe this should be considered and factored in to long term schedule.