Quote from: -Greed- on April 04, 2016, 07:05:17 PM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on April 04, 2016, 04:46:08 PM

Quote from: sandiman on April 04, 2016, 03:38:57 PM

Let's suppose that one day Synereo provide exactly the same as facebook exept that users get rewarded by using the social network

I already documented the economics of that. Ad revenue would never pay enough to motivate users to share. They share for much more valuable reasons. No one is going to work for $1 to $10 per day. Ads in developing countries pay less, because people spend less.

Get back when you have a research not your own understandings. But for now ~~GTFO~~ keep envying the success of Synereo it makes me laugh.

TPTB, using a social network doesn't equate to "working". You are miscorrelating the two. You are correct in the fact that people share for much more valuable reason than ad revenue. That fact leads me to ask, "Wouldn't you rather use a social network which rewarded you for your participation instead of a centralized entity?"

Quote from: -Greed- on April 04, 2016, 07:05:17 PM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on April 04, 2016, 04:46:08 PM

Quote from: sandiman on April 04, 2016, 03:38:57 PM

(without speaking about huge privacy issues in centralised social networks), isn't that enough for people to switch to Synereo ?

No. That is what the past experiments of many decentralized attempts have shown.

It's so jerk to think if one failed you shouldn't even try. Actually every new attempt brings new experience and makes it better. So something will replace Facebook eventually just like Facebook did to MySpace.

Exactly. Nothing lasts forever. Trends change, businesses change, and so do social networks.