@roslinpl

I request again that you clarify your statement on why you are quite sure that my accusations are false. It's been well over a month since you made it in THIS POST (in this thread), and it seems you are unable to back up your statement. Were you intentionally being dishonest? Do you believe what you said? If you were forced to say it, I would understand. You can respond here, pm, anywhere really. That way I can stop asking.

I noticed your local rules and am interested in whether or not they will be enforced. I think perhaps Betcoin has convinced you that "spam" is anything that makes you look bad. It's not. Some examples of spam would be when someone just fills up big space with random characters, when someone is just copy/pasting the same thing over and over, or when someone is just quoting a something big and just saying two words under it to take up space on the screen LIKE THIS

If your rules are enforced, you may end up getting several members of your own campaign banned , including the sponsor!

Quote from: hopenotlate on April 04, 2016, 09:16:09 PM

Quote from: TwitchySeal link=topic=1236667.msg14414635#msg14414635

A perfect example is back in october, I had a serious issue involving over $1k USD worth of BTC missing. Betcoin makes a statement, about a policy never mentioned or practiced by other sites I say something about it, and immediately hopenotelate jumps to defend Betcoin with a 100% lie. Then just ignores any question of why he said that. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=386266.msg12699686#msg12699686

Your statement above is partially false as well:

there are pokerrooms where you dont get awarded VIP points if you join tournaments by winning satellites.
Why are you stating the false then?

Yes there are poker rooms that do not award VIP points for mtts you qualify for. I did not say there isn't.

I'll concede that I can not prove that there are no other sites with a rewards program that rewards mtt players based on the fee they paid, unless they qualified via satellite (which they also paid a separate fee for) which awarded both the buy in + fee from the prize pool. (Which means they raked the satellite entry twice, and only pay vip rewards once)

I still stand behind my statement and would be surprised if you were to prove me wrong. It's possible though.

Quote from: hopenotlate on April 04, 2016, 09:16:09 PM

I played several ipoker skins that used (at least when I was playing there) that practice (if its that one the practice you are referring to) and incerely thought the whole ipoker network was doing the same (prove me I'm wrong on Ipoker please because I still sincerely think so).

It's possible, I suppose.

iPoker has a very unorthodox approach to rakeback. More recently they switched to a model which awards rakeback based on how much a player has deposit and lost/won rather than how much has actually been raked from the hands they played relative to the ammount they contributed to pot.

I think more likely you didn't understand the policy then, now, or both.

Quote from: hopenotlate on April 04, 2016, 09:16:09 PM

I live in a gaming regulated country where player of my nationality are compelled to play on our country pokerrooms against players of my same nationality and most of them still do that practice.

I doubt that.

Not that it really matters, but I too live in a (very) regulated jurisdiction and can say for a fact that none of them have such a policy.

Quote from: hopenotlate on April 04, 2016, 09:16:09 PM

You are a great selective quoter: you could also quote a post of mine following by few posts the one you quoted where I adimit I was wrong when stating that stars and iPoker are the first two in poker industry for numbers of players but instead are first and fourth: so what I wrote wasnt completely false but only partially (stars is the first) and two position wrong about ipoker (fourth instead of second).
So I kept on answering your post and didnt "just ignore any question" and you stated.

Yes, it's true inTHIS POST you admited you were wrong about ipoker being the second biggest. I doubt most members of this campaign would have done that, well done. I don't see how this was relevant enough to mention.

Quote from: hopenotlate on April 04, 2016, 09:16:09 PM

Why are you stating the false then?

I'm not.

Quote from: hopenotlate on April 04, 2016, 09:16:09 PM

Then, one or two page after, there is another post of mine where I wrote I asked a friend of mine who plays on partypoker and he told me I was wrong about the vippoints/satellites policy and at the end of my post I clearly wrote I was wrong and it was my bad.
But of course you have been careful not to quote it to make me appear an inveterate liar.
So it was the second post from me answering to the one you just quoted here.

First, lets look at Betcoins original statement and the first response:

Quote from: hopenotlate on October 14, 2015, 08:27:38 AM

Quote from: Betcoin.AG on October 13, 2015, 09:33:05 PM

For clarity, players receive VIP points when you use your bitcoin to buy into a satellite tournament based on the fees you pay. You do not receive VIP points on the tournament that you are entered into once you win the seat.

...and, by the way, it is what happens in every FIAT based pokerroom.

So hope noone will complain about it.

Keep in mind, what you said was completely false. (No other poker major room has this policy, probably no other room period)

Why would I bother to mention that in THIS POSTyou said you asked a friend and found out that ONE site does not have the same policy. Thats still implying the policy is normal and makes sense, which is against my entire argument.

Quote from: hopenotlate on October 14, 2015, 08:27:38 AM

Why again you stating the false saying I completely ignored you?

Because you did. You still haven't explained why you made THIS POST It's ok though, you aren't running a poker site, so I stopped asking.

Quote from: hopenotlate on October 14, 2015, 08:27:38 AM

Who is the liar?

You are a liar. There are many though and most of them have much worse intentions than you. I think you just took something I said too personally.