Fuck i told a LONG winded story about how i shit myself in the Wallmart parking lot
Spoetnik the epitome of class.
I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.
What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..
They accomplished nothing.
Well everybody accomplishes something. Whether it's good or bad is another story.
The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....
Wait a second... you think "Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, and Mike Tyson" were the best at what they did? On what grounds are you making that comment? Drug addiction or thuggery?
I think I've already identified your problem.
But getting back to results of actions rather than intent of morals--so you're pimping what is likely faulty technology and TPTB_need _war is dismissing that technology based on the available info, so the result of those actions is that you are convincing people to invest badly and TPTB_need_war is convincing people to invest wisely--you're the bad guy. No amount of moral soap boxing is going to dismiss a sound technical argument, it may distract those with a low-technical aptitude, but it will never erase a valid point. I suggest you get off his balls and invalidate his points, or pick a new coin to shill. People like yourself waste everybody's time (and money if anyone is dumb enough to take you seriously) and (try to) drag this whole forum into the realm of he said/she said.
I'm not recommending that anyone invest in anything. That's what you do with your Monero posts. All I'm doing is informing people of an alternative social network platform, which I think will help promote free speech and the general well-being of society.
The reason you don't like what I'm saying is because you know that I view you as "not the right type of person", and you'd be correct about that assumption. Imo, anyone who makes comments about "crowdsourcing a Jenna Jameson android", who is a well-known pornographer, to look 'cool' or 'manly' has some serious self-esteem issues. You're worse than someone who exposes themselves on the internet, because at least they are doing it to themselves, but you're advocating doing it to women.
Can you invalidate any of Shelby's criticisms of synereo? If not, why are you wasting everyone's time? Besides the obvious of having a bag of synereo that your emotionally bound to defend until it reaches some set price goal that you think will make you a success.
All of Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are his personal opinions. There's nothing to invalidate.
I think you're a waste of time, dude. Not sure why you are getting all two bit psychologist on me, but if Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are just opinions, you should be able to show as much--end of story. So do that and stop trying to assassinate people's character with your soap box moralizing. This is a technical forum, not a church.
Hey, I didn't tell Shelby to post a picture of "someone else's" groin (without clarifying that it wasn't his), and I didn't tell you to make that Jenna Jameson comment. Like it or not, people judge others on their actions. If you don't want to be judged then, be smart enough to keep quiet. You know as well as I do that you can't have a discussion with Shelby. Shelby thinks everything is wrong unless he is doing it. In Shelby's mind, Shelby is always right one-hundred percent of the time, and nobody is going to change that.
Weird that you assume that I'm somehow ashamed of my willingness to crowdfund a Jenna Jameson sexbot (but whatever).
Anyone with half a brain has figured out that you are only using the moral low-ground argument because you either don't have a technical argument to invalidate Shelby's criticism or you lost the technical argument already and want to shift the ground to save face.
What's great about a sound technical argument is you can keep posting it without making any adjustments and save yourself a lot of time and hassle. So post one or STFU.
Here' mine:
DecentralizeEconomics can't invalidate Shelby's criticism of Synereo, so he is attempting to attack Shelby's character and by that invalidate Shelby's criticism for those stupid enough to believe technical arguments can be invalidated non-technical arguments.
An example would be: Caravaggio murdered a man, therefore his paintings are worthless or poor quality. Though anyone who knows the slightest thing about art would know that history has proven Caravaggio's art is priceless, and oddly enough, he is considered one of the greatest painters of the gospels to ever live despite his less than gospel life--put that in your morality pipe and smoke it.
What's great about this is that now I can copy/paste the technical argument that shows you and your agenda for what they really are and I don't have to waste time running in pointless circles. I love efficiency.
